Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Rocky Mountain Int'l (OTC:RMIL former OTC:OVIS) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: tonto who wrote (46494)	4/30/1998 10:15:00 PM
From: Rich_1	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 55532

Tonto, you mean the same facts that were used when the decision was made to naked short this one big time. You seem to not want to accept the fact that most of the shareholders here are in this one to combat the naked shorting which is widespread among BB stocks. Nobody said that this was a great company (yet). Rich_1 You are responding to this message from tonto on Apr 30 1998 Question regarding SEC, answer= NO Other stocks, yes Ignoring facts is not protecting investment.

To: tonto who wrote (46494)	5/1/1998 11:55:00 PM
From: MY OPINION	Respond to of 55532

Tonto,Looks like you lost your luster! FAMH - FIRAMADA Staffing Services 5 Replies. Back to #14520 Subject: FAMH - FIRAMADA Staffing Services To: tonto From: DADDY BIGS May 1 1998 1:10PM EST Reply #14522 of 14663 GO AWAY <eom> Subject: FAMH - FIRAMADA Staffing Services To: tonto From: Brad May 1 1998 1:13PM EST Reply #14523 of 14663 Tonto, It doesn't have to be "many" companies. That could be just one. But it sure looks great to me! :-) Best wishes, Brad Subject: FAMH - FIRAMADA Staffing Services To: tonto From: M. Murray May 1 1998 1:16PM EST Reply #14524 of 14663 Tonto, Because of the tax obligation being resolved that means that $33,000,000 worth of Myriad business agreements that were pending are now able to be fulfilled. Get it? MM Subject: FAMH - FIRAMADA Staffing Services To: tonto From: JIN CHUN May 1 1998 1:35PM EST Reply #14534 of 14663 Tonto, Ira had stated before that there were a lot of companies that wanted to use Myriad's services but wouldn't touch it until their tax obligations were cleared. I believe that this was stated in a CC. It makes sense. If you wanted to use a bank but the bank had tax problems, would you use it? Jin. Subject: FAMH - FIRAMADA Staffing Services To: tonto From: David Colvin May 1 1998 1:37PM EST Reply #14538 of 14663 Tonto said, "Mr. Monas commented on the positive effect this will have on Myriad's immediate future. "Myriad has in excess of $33 Million worth of employment agreements which have been held pending resolution of Myriad's tax obligation. Firamada's settlement agreement on that obligation allows these employment contracts to be implemented. This means over $33 Million worth of additional business can now be added to Myriad's books and, consequently, Firamada's 1998 revenues. Needless to say, we are very excited as this makes us even more optimistic about Firamada's 1998 revenue projections." Does anyone understand this? $33,000,000 additional revenue tied to resolution of tax obligation. How come so many different companies have the same conditions in their contracts?" ******************************************************************** Tonto, do you EVER have anything positive to say about ANYTHING? You haunted the RMIL thread for months (and still do) with negativism, and now this thread. Exactly what is your problem? I've seen you, also, on other threads and have yet to see you say ANYTHING positive about ANY stock....always negative innuendo. Frustrated in St. Louis Dave

To: tonto who wrote (46494)	5/2/1998 12:10:00 AM
From: MY OPINION	Respond to of 55532

<<<The other two questions will be answered with the information I shall provide.>>> You never did answer these!

To: tonto who wrote (46494)	5/2/1998 10:35:00 PM
From: MY OPINION	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 55532

Tonto, You state that you know what was said and done at the dinner meeting,but you want Riley to post it first. WHY? <<<There is a reason I want Riley to give it out or for others to learn it and post it. I want things on record.>>> if you are sure you are right,then why not post it? you want things on the record,what record? either you know or you don't.

To: tonto who wrote (46494)	5/2/1998 11:59:00 PM
From: Riley G	Respond to of 55532

Interesting comments from you to someone else. Pry tell, fill us in on the meeting and what you were told and by who? Of course you want things on record, so answer your own question with your own answer. You brought it up, so fill us in. It does appear that you opened yourself up to an investigation or deposition by RMIL, RMCW, and other defendants, or myself in Morks civil suit. There is only one way you could have known about this dinner meeting that Mork attended, and that's by a direct link to Mork or his brokerage firm associates that appear to be spoon feeding you and a few select others (mis)information. Well this could prove very interesting in the discovery process for us defendants! To steal an unnamed brokers comments, "I can save you." Riley G _______________________________________________________________ From: tonto Friday, May 1 1998 6:34AM ET XXXXXXXXX, the information is available elsewhere, I am done for the time being giving out information. There is a reason I want Riley to give it out or for others to learn it and post it. I want things on record.