SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Value Investing -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: jeffbas who wrote (3960)5/1/1998 12:09:00 AM
From: Ron Bower  Respond to of 78470
 
GAI
Looked at just before IPO. Was offered thru Furman Selz with CIBC Oppenheimer has co-manager.

IPO'd at 19 and immediately ran to 20.5/8, dropped below 19 and has hovered above 19 since.

Positives were listed - negatives are:
65% owned by Sham family. Paid CEO $1M for patents. Has two patent infringement cases against company. Sunbeam is 45% of sales. Paid Sunbeam $1M to get the contract. Growth directly related to Sunbeam contract. Other growth minimal. Intelligence says capacity restraints will force component outsourcing. Prices falling on prime product bread maker unit due to lower demand.

IMO - GAI may have promise but I passed in favor of AEHCF.

For what it's worth,
Ron



To: jeffbas who wrote (3960)5/1/1998 9:34:00 AM
From: 18acastra  Respond to of 78470
 
IPO was at $19.

Underwriters were Furman Selz and Oppoenheimer. Think IPO has been flattish because of Sunbeam overhang and underwriters still in post-IPO quiet period, so no post-IPO support yet.