Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Donner Minerals (DML.V) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: wayne cath who wrote (4284)	4/30/1998 10:11:00 PM
From: Buckey	Respond to of 11676

Hi wayne; I have been reading many threads lately as I seem to have found a few gems and a few dogs - I am downsizing to concentrate on just a few. Every thread that is on the upswing has a lot of dreamers - not necessarily hypers but dreamers - A lot of IFs - alot of people probably crunching magical numbers in their head on what their Gains would be IF. I have been cautiously bullish. I think SVB looks good but the predators are drooling for a good result to ride up so they can ride her back down on the shorts. teck and DML are not stupid - I think they will play us a little on the first go around and drill a high probabity target even if it would not be their first choice otherwise. We are many holes from a Mine ( I think). I am getting some more but will not be sitting on anything like I did last fall - I think tomorow could be exciting and the next few weeks and IF IF IF IF IF we do start hitting some solid results on more than just one hole some of the great things will happen that we dream about. But then again that is what this game is all about. I take it any day over my blue chippers that trade 20k a day at $35 in a 30 cent range

To: wayne cath who wrote (4284)	4/30/1998 10:24:00 PM
From: 1king	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 11676

Wayne, 10Q. I personally thought that 15m of 2% was spectacular. I thought the cobalt numbers were the most significant data to come out of SVB re. the chemistry of the system. I thought the high grade squirt was very important re. connections to the R factor (sulphide magma vs silicate magma blah blah blah) and possible multiple pulses. I thought the recognition of more mafic material by way of petrography is typical and will continue to expand the spatial potential of the area. The market didn't. DML down to 0.7? over the winter? That was beyond my comprehension! I would like to know if the big movers and shakers in the "business" have a clue about mining plays. Maybe then I wouldn't be so nervous about these schmo's jerking clients and the share price around. Please be patient and hopefully we will be rewarded. My opinion only 1King