Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Corporate Vision (CVIA) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Frank Henriquez who wrote (4418)	5/1/1998 4:52:00 AM
From: Ricstar	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 6654

You're absolutely right, Frank. The merger had the potential to give this stock the boost it needed. Instead, our responsible management let us down. We followed Jack Arnold, who led us to believe that the interests of the shareholders were the number one priority - "We greatly appreciate the patience and support we have received from our shareholders. It is our desire and firm intention to negotiate an agreement which will best represent the interests of our shareholders who are the owners of Corporate Vision" (Jack Arnold, 11/19/97 Press Release.) Here's to you Jack. The "Italian Salute" from the Ricstar. As a late night afterthought, since it appears that Jack, at one time, recognized that the shareholders are the owners of Corporate Vision, and since it appears that the shareholders are dissatisfied with the agreement and the outrageous reverse split, shouldn't it follow that Jack should recognize the will of the "owners" and modify or nullify this deal. Talk is cheap, Jack.

To: Frank Henriquez who wrote (4418)	5/1/1998 8:25:00 AM
From: Ellen	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 6654

Looking them up under Yahoo - both ISGI and TWTI - results in "symbol unknown". ?? You said: > Some of the same people and companies involved with TWTI (in particular, with the Reg S issue) are involved with CVIA/WOTD. < Can you elaborate?

To: Frank Henriquez who wrote (4418)	5/1/1998 9:57:00 AM
From: Wayne J.	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 6654

Hello! Frank, I just read your posting #4418...........!!!!!!!! You mentioned in that posting that some of the same people that are involved in CVIA/WOTD are the same people involved in another company that you have indicated is now bankrupt but still trading as a shell! Two thoughts immediately come to mind! #1.- Have you contacted Jack and shared this information with him? If you decide to follow up with Jack may I ask you to post your findings/ feedback on this thread!------( Sounds like some very critical information that Jack should be made aware of in my opinion!).... #2.- If as you have stated some CVIA/WOTD people are involved in a bankrupt company that is still trading as a shell, then maybe a question that you could consider asking Jack, is why have they not considererd using that Shell Company for the WOTD Merger rather then going through all these logistical hoops and shareholder concerns on the CVIA Shell side? Frank! To me this sounds like very important , crucial and critical considerations! --- maybe the fact we have not yet received a press release is goods news thus far, in case Jack feels it appropriate that he follow up immediately with your expressed concerns! My compliments to you in the excellent research and investigating and thank you for sharing it with the thread! Best Regards, Wayne J.