Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Discuss Go2Net's acquisition of our beloved SI -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: 246810 who wrote (324)	5/1/1998 6:43:00 AM
From: Lane3	Respond to of 446

Brad and company are probably still thinking through how they want to handle the transition of members and others, and may be for some time. If there are not yet any answers to the questions, perhaps Brad could give the thread at least a rough idea of 1)when members might know the decisions and 2)how those decisions will be communicated to the membership.

To: 246810 who wrote (324)	5/1/1998 10:38:00 PM
From: David Lawrence	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 446

I've been silent on the issue of membership status - grandfathering - contributors - and, umm, submit-challenged individuals, 'til now. Fact: SI is a content driven site. If people don't post, people won't read. The quotes and other fringe features are very nice to have and add value, but are not of unique benefit without the real-time interactive discussion. I see GNET as extending the offerings, both free and fee based. But, they need an active and targeted customer base to drive the enterprise value, something which SI surely has. I think the answer to the point of the membership status discussion is crystal clear. Active members will maintain their current standing, whether paid or not. Paid members will maintain their standing, whether active or not. Non-paying non-posting members are standing on the edge of the abyss and need to contribute to be grandfathered, or face paying up or losing posting privileges and/or real-time access. Management is probably not in a position to comment on the future, since they are in a state of negotiation as they plan the wedding. There is almost certainly language in the current agreements that prohibit them from changing any basic operating or membership principles. I do not speak for SI in any manner, nor am I privy to their negotiations. But, I'll venture a personal opinion for the non-paid submit-challenged who want to protect their privileges: A window of opportunity looms before you, but it may close. Seize the moment and convert your status into a contributing member. I think it matters not what or where - but something in your message log is surely better than nothing. Make yourself into something of value to SI/GNET - an active member. Don't be worried about the worthiness of the content - you'll do fine. Take me for example - what I lack in substantive content I more than make up for in sheer volume. Try it - you'll like it! Further Affiant Sayeth Not.