Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Naxos Resources (NAXOF) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Tom Frederick who wrote (12513)	5/1/1998 2:56:00 PM
From: ShoppinTheNet	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 20681

Hi Tom, I have found your posts today delightful. You made some excellent counter points to Mr. Hill. Lets all hope he responds to your questions. If not, then you can consider yourself the winner of that debate. Please allow me to address one statement you made. "Mr. 2 mentions the long history of Naxos claiming a unique, complex ore and proprietary methods of recovery. However, Naxos has shed that image by now using completely standard testing and COC material so that analogy no longer holds water." I understand that Naxos believes (May I assume you do as well? By the way I do to ) that in switching to the new SFA process the recovery process will be standard as well. If the recovery process is standard, and simple, then we should be seeing proof of this process very soon. Lets say two months tops. Please, any mining professionals correct this guess, I pulled it out of my hat for sake of discussion. The next questions I would direct to you as it is your statement "Naxos has shed that image". How have they shed this image? What does that mean to you? To me that would mean that if I contacted several savvy Jr. Mining stock investors , the press covering the Naxos story, and Mutual fund managers, who were aware of the past position Naxos had taken, they would now feel that Naxos now had a standard recovery process and not a complex one as previously stated? I have no proof that this is the sentiment with these groups. Are you aware of any information the would prove that these groups feel this way? You and I declaring the past is gone will not make it so! The point I am trying to make that it is not that simple to shed the past, just because you say you did. This is not like a snake shedding its skin. People will look at past history and statements as part of their determination to buy or not. Massive efforts must be taken to over come the history and reputation of Naxos