To: John Mansfield who wrote (15777 ) 5/1/1998 11:42:00 AM From: John Mansfield Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 31646
[INTEL] From their 10K; from Yardeni's site 'Company Intel Corp (INTC) Standard Industry Code 3674: Semiconductors & Related Devices Report 10K Filing Date 3/27/98 Y2K Compliance Notes Like many other companies, the year 2000 computer issue creates risk for Intel. If internal systems do not correctly recognize date information when the year changes to 2000, there could be an adverse impact on the Company's operations. The Company has initiated a comprehensive project to prepare its computer systems for the year 2000 and plans to have changes to critical systems completed by the first quarter of 1999 to allow time for testing. The Company is also assessing the capability of its products sold to customers over a period of years to handle the year 2000 and has a plan in place to address product issues during 1998. Management believes that the likelihood of a material adverse impact due to problems with internal systems or products sold to customers is remote and expects that the cost of these projects over the next two years will not have a material effect on the Company's financial position or overall trends in results of operations. Intel is also contacting critical suppliers of products and services to determine that the suppliers' operations and the products and services they provide are year 2000 capable or to monitor their progress toward year 2000 capability. There can be no assurance that another company's failure to ensure year 2000 capability would not have an adverse effect on the Company. The Company's future results of operations and the other forward-looking statements contained in this outlook - in particular the statements regarding growth in the computing industry, gross margin, capital spending, depreciation, research and development, marketing and general and administrative expenses, the FTC investigation and the year 2000 issue - involve a number of risks and uncertainties. In addition to the factors discussed above, among the other factors that could cause actual results to differ materially are the following: changes in customer order patterns, including changes in customer and channel inventory levels; competitive factors, such as rival chip architectures and manufacturing technologies, competing software-compatible microprocessors and availability of other computing alternatives; timing of software industry product introductions; execution of the manufacturing ramp; the ability to successfully integrate and operate any acquired businesses; costs or other adverse effects associated with processors and other products containing errata (deviations from published specifications); risks associated with foreign operations; and litigation involving intellectual property, consumer and other issues.