SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Stock Mania ! - Mutual Funds that can short. -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: kahunabear who wrote (32)5/1/1998 8:57:00 PM
From: kahunabear  Respond to of 129
 
All,

Here's an article on the short-short rule that was dropped to make these types of funds more viable.

sddt.com

WS



To: kahunabear who wrote (32)5/2/1998 11:00:00 AM
From: Knighty Tin  Respond to of 129
 
WS, The Short-Short Rule was the worst thing in the world for performance for anyone who isn't a buy and hold type. The basic rule, which went into effect in the 1940s or 30s, before I was around to gripe about it -g-, went like this:

"No more than 30 pct. of the gross income of a registered investment company can be derived from capital gains on positions held less than 90 days."

Now, this doesn't sound so bad and I don't think the writers planned it to be so bad. But the key word is "gross." Let me explain. You have a gain of $1 million dollars on a long call you have held for 60 days. You also have a loss of $500,000 on a long put you have held for a similar amount of time. In fact, let's say you bought a straddle and that these positions are sort of wed together. You sell both. Now, we all know that you made half a million bucks. But, in calculation of "gross income," you cannot deduct the losses from the gains. So, for short short rule calculation purposes, you have a gain of $1 million.

Obviously, short short was designed to prevent churning. But it is obvious that it is prejudicial against any type of hedged trade.

Continued in next note.