Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : ProNetLink..(PNLK) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Jody Sherman who wrote (1687)	5/1/1998 11:40:00 AM
From: Jim Munson	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 8242

Hooray!!!! It's good to hear a rational statement rather than unsubstantiated hype. Their are a few good posts here but generally a lot of GO GO music which gives the appearance of a herd of "pump and dump" specialists. Let's stick to DD and informative posts.

To: Jody Sherman who wrote (1687)	5/1/1998 11:43:00 AM
From: Lawrence	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 8242

Jody I've read EVERY post over the last 2 days and you're post has summed up exactly how I feel too. Have the Investor Relations packets been delivered to people who have requested them days ago? Since everyone who is extremely positive about PNLK has also said they've done the DD on it. Could we concentrate on the companies details and not the minute by minute price. For people who are in for the long run, I find it a bit obsessive to call every 10 cent jump a sign that the sellers have left. I have tried to shed some light on how Proxicom will play a role in PNLK, by asking the PR company and I would like to see more PNLK related information on this thread and less hype. Lawrence

To: Jody Sherman who wrote (1687)	5/1/1998 11:43:00 AM
From: Go Fast	Respond to of 8242

Jody, For the most part I agree with you. I too had questions about this company after I accumulated 10K. I called investor relations yesterday and spoke with actual person on the phone. I think both pro and con about this company should be presented but when some people come in and spread lies or questionable accusastions somebody needs to correct unfounded comments. I suggest everybody check out their web site and call their IR. No body here is telling you to buy or anyone else for that matter. People need to make their own decision. Hoping for some good in these down days. Thanks John

To: Jody Sherman who wrote (1687)	5/1/1998 11:43:00 AM
From: Dixie7777	Respond to of 8242

I can't say I'm sorry if you "feel" offended. I don't. What I believe you should do is differentiate between a person, especially a "disinterested" person's "FEELINGS," and an "INTERESTED" person's legitimate concerns based upon "FACTS." With all due respect, I believe I understand how you "feel," but I would appreciate it if you would also understand the motives of these rat bastards that DON'T give a damn about you, me, or anyone else here on the thread. They only wish to drive the share price down, put more cheap shares into the pockets of the MM's and sell 'em back to us at higher prices. PLEASE understand, Rich

To: Jody Sherman who wrote (1687)	5/1/1998 11:44:00 AM
From: Mark Harjes	Respond to of 8242

I HATE 'me-toos', but this is something that has needed saying for a long while. Now back to lurking and evaluating. ...Mark

To: Jody Sherman who wrote (1687)	5/1/1998 11:49:00 AM
From: xclently	Respond to of 8242

These are the key area's that have to be answered...and 3rd or 4th request has anyone gotten the investor's packet yet?Jody hit it on the head when she stated: >>>I find it a little disconcerting that their web site has vague descriptions of things. I find it just as disconcerting that they don't have to post numbers with the SEC. I do however, believe that the stock will go up, if from nothing other than the anticipation of their launch. I am banking on that fact. What happens after launch, I don't know. None of you do either.<<< I find the vague releases and lead time to get the packet disconcerting...It shouldn't take a week to get; heck, it they are so adept on the 'net (which they should be) why don't they, or proxicom, put it on their site...I hope the site pans out, I like the idea, (I did recover my costs at $4.50 so I have a free ride now) but am still interested in this--If I had satifactory answers, I would buy more as an investor. Without the financials and answers to these questions, I don't consider this an investment -- you are speculating and buying into a dream...geez, I will keep you all informed if I ever get a company going...I would love to have this loyalty!!! (I promise to be fully reporting, though.) Best wishes and I do thank all those who have helped to get the information that we are going on now...if only they would answer the financials, namely where is the money coming from, and what price is the shareholder paying for it? Please understand the predicament that I/we are in...great story, but so was Goldilocks... Best Regards, Peter

To: Jody Sherman who wrote (1687)	5/1/1998 11:52:00 AM
From: Tim Luke	Respond to of 8242

We will build our base today.

To: Jody Sherman who wrote (1687)	5/1/1998 12:01:00 PM
From: Kevin G. O'Neill	Respond to of 8242

Jody, your thoughtful comments are extremely welcome here. The scale of this thread is difficult enough without a lot of vitriol. While I understand the motivations behind the heat, I think we can begin to move towards a cooler level of discourse. Best of luck to you and thanks for speaking up.ÿÿ ÿÿÿÿÿÿ ÿÿÿ ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ-kevin

To: Jody Sherman who wrote (1687)	5/1/1998 12:19:00 PM
From: Peter Mui	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 8242

> What happens after launch, I don't know. None of you do either. It goes without saying that it is impossible to predict where this company is headed or if they will even succeed. They are heading into uncharted territory and there are no existing businesses to gauge them by. I bought in yesterday because I think they have a good idea (just wish I had waited until today's drop to jump in). I do business with companies in Asia so I have a base of connections and contacts to work with. However, my company is always looking for new trading partners and connections to expand our operations. I believe that there are many companies out there like mine that will have use for PNLKs services. Whether or not they can execute is all speculation on our part. It remains to be seen if companies will indeed sign up with PNLK instead of using traditional contract brokers. If they can pull it off, the shareholders win. If not, well, I will have learned a very expensive lesson. I will however hold my shares and see how the site pans out. I think unsubstantiated cheerleading for PNLK is unnecessary and thoughtful exchange will serve everyone better. Any thoughtful sentiments out there, including negative ones, are appreciated. Regards, Peter