Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Biotech / Medical : Zonagen (zona) - good buy? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Dauntless who wrote (3755)	5/1/1998 12:50:00 PM
From: Linda Kaplan	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 7041

Your post, the one to which I'm responding. contains lies and slurs. Basically, that's about all you ever have to say in your posts: lies and slurs. Just show us the post where you said what you just said you said. In fact, I recall that you said you considered the stock high risk and that that is why you reduced the position. You did NOT mention any of those people in that post and certainly didn't mention ME. That's my recollection. Easily proven or disproven. You won't because you can't. You're revising history, as you have so often done on this thread. Your posts are unethical and contain falsehoods. This is easily settled. Find the first post in which you said you reduced your position and we'll all see exactly what you said. You won't do it any more than you produced that article about which you made false claims and you won't do it because it will prove that your posts contain lies. Linda

To: Dauntless who wrote (3755)	5/1/1998 12:54:00 PM
From: Myron David Kor	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 7041

I am very happy you have someone to play with Linda. Look again at my spelling of Asensio's nickname. Asholio has been used all over this board and others, I don't believe I have ever spelled it the way you have. Linda, wait for the AUA presentation. Your statement that Zonagen will not be approved has no factual basis! Do you remember the way your buddy Willie referred to the CEO, Joe P? He did this over and over. What was your response at that time?

To: Dauntless who wrote (3755)	5/1/1998 2:06:00 PM
From: Linda Kaplan	Respond to of 7041

You posted today: I wrote that I had reduced my position because I was uncertain as to the effects of Asensio, Wexler and you could possibly have on the stock - it just was not worth the risk. None of the recent movements of this stock, up or down, can be justified in any fundamental manner - they're emotional. The liars had driven it too low, it recovered to 20 on its own, and has risen above wht I think is justified by the patent announcement. There is not a shred of truth in the above statement. You posted simply that you'd sold most of your position. If you subsequently indicated any reason for selling, your only reason for selling was that it was to reduce your risk. You have been one of the worst offenders to truth in this thread. You have engaged in stupid and childish name-calling and whenever there was a reasonable argument presented with which you disagreed, instead of responding on subject, you called names and tried to dig up dirt against your opponent. The above quote from you today is a good example of the degree to which you distort reality and truth in your posts. Linda