Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : PLFM - Undervalued with great potential -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: neverenough who wrote (1708)	5/1/1998 12:22:00 PM
From: Mark Shantz	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 9096

Sorry Nigel: This one deserves a response. What was the purpose of bringing that onto the board today? That's 3 days old. What are your last initials; MM? I don't normally flame people but on a day like this, posting of 3 day old info. seems suspect. Good luck to all who are long!!

To: neverenough who wrote (1708)	5/1/1998 12:24:00 PM
From: TERPJIM	Respond to of 9096

The Brazilian test is not mentioned in that newsletter. I'm not selling my shares. Jim

To: neverenough who wrote (1708)	5/1/1998 12:35:00 PM
From: SEAS	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 9096

At present we are placing a SELL recommendation on Platforms International (nasdaq-bb--PLFM). We initially recommended this issue on 7-09-97 @ .08/share presently PLFM is bid at .87--our overall gain equals 988%!! From Nigels post #1708

To: neverenough who wrote (1708)	5/1/1998 1:02:00 PM
From: socrates2	Respond to of 9096

It's absolutely wrong to judge the value of PLFM based on its current earning or revenue. We all know that. We are here for its future, great future. The future is not far away, It's very close, it's next week! People may worry the fast pace of this stock showed last ten days. It is understandable. But it's not always to mean the stock is over heated. It can also suggest that the stock was terribly undervalued before the run. This is exactly the case for PLFM. I was in at 0.33, I thought it's undervalued. I still think it's undervalued when it hit today's high. I strongly suggest everyone to read the special report about wireless telecom on April issue of Scientific American.