Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Compaq -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: robbie who wrote (25381)	5/1/1998 2:23:00 PM
From: Roads End	Respond to of 97611

One more thing to worry about. biz.yahoo.com

To: robbie who wrote (25381)	5/1/1998 2:23:00 PM
From: Eddie Kim	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 97611

*OTrobbie** That was Duke's game. Kentucky was able to win because they shot the lights out, BUT also because Duke ran out of timeouts, and missed so many foul shots. If any one of these three did not occur...Duke wins. You should have seen the all the Kentucky fans (roughly 80% of the fans there)...they were thanking God when they won and saying how they just stole that game away from Duke. In the end Kentucky won because they had experience... About the 1992 game....that's was anybodies game. It just came down to execution in the final seconds. As for Laettner's once in a life time play...he seemed to have lot of those during his Duke days. Anyways we'll see...Duke plays Kentucky next year during the season.