SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Market Gems:Stocks w/Strong Earnings and High Tech. Rank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Jenna who wrote (8877)5/2/1998 8:10:00 AM
From: Dave Shares  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 120523
 
ASTX

From same press release previously posted:

''As we look into the near future, we expect revenues from new products related to technology buys and from non-semiconductor markets to continue the strength shown in the third quarter. However, we expect a further decline in revenues from products that are primarily related to semiconductor fab capacity as our customers further reduce inventory. These factors may result in a 5%-10% sequential decline in Q4 revenues. Based on the revenue and product mix outlook for the fourth quarter, we expect gross margins may decline and fourth quarter net income may decline sequentially approximately 50% despite expense control measures that have been implemented.''

I think it is fair to say that the forward statement above is what caused the stock to tank after earnings.

As Paul Harvey would say, "and now you know the rest of the story"

The earnings plays posted here are great, and I am finding from observation that they are much safer being played in advance and taking advantage of the pre-earnings runups. I see too many good reports that lead to profit taking. But I want to make it clear (not that anyone would care what I have to say) that many of the companies posted are enjoying terrific pre-earnings runups, it is a matter of watching carefully.

David



To: Jenna who wrote (8877)5/2/1998 8:59:00 AM
From: tom pope  Respond to of 120523
 
Jenna, I suppose you saw the article on FactSet on page 4 of today's IBD? Sounds like the system was designed for you. Now if you can find some way for Marketgems to assess all of your regulars a trivial amount each time they sign on, it might pay for the $150K a year the little system costs. Just a modest proposal.