Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : TAVA Technologies (TAVA-NASDAQ) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: C.K. Houston who wrote (15833)	5/1/1998 9:16:00 PM
From: Cliff.A	Respond to of 31646

Cheryl, I agree! Go for it! Cliff

To: C.K. Houston who wrote (15833)	5/1/1998 9:28:00 PM
From: james h. snyder	Respond to of 31646

can there not be multiple hit points? different topic titles but linked to the same data source? just a thought. and to you.....ck houston......your hard work is greatly appreciated by many.....may you keep the energy up for your project. i, thank you. jim

To: C.K. Houston who wrote (15833)	5/2/1998 12:50:00 AM
From: Kathy Riley	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 31646

Yes, great idea, Cheryl. Thanks.

To: C.K. Houston who wrote (15833)	5/2/1998 9:14:00 AM
From: robert e staley	Respond to of 31646

OK! Yes! Most certainly! Excellent!

To: C.K. Houston who wrote (15833)	5/2/1998 12:19:00 PM
From: PitBull	Respond to of 31646

Cheryl, as you suggested, we should write companies regarding the y2K problem to see how they respond. Was wondering if there should be a thread to post these company responses so that others can see and maybe you would desire to analyze these letters for any holes in them? I suspect they have a standard letter they send every one. Also, because you are so knowledgeable on the subject, perhaps by posting the letters you or others can advise what the 2nd and 3rd letters should ask as we pinpoint banks, mutual fund companies, etc further. Maybe we should ask them, too, WHO is solving their y2k problems? I have begun receiving replies, but don't know how to analyze them.

To: C.K. Houston who wrote (15833)	5/2/1998 1:55:00 PM
From: vpelt	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 31646

Cheryl: By all means lets move TAVA to the Y2K category. Later we can hope SI has an "SI" category; that the Systems Integration grows up to deserve the niche (<G'ing> with a serious notion). vpelt