Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Biotech / Medical : Zonagen (zona) - good buy? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Michael who wrote (3788)	5/1/1998 9:55:00 PM
From: Linda Kaplan	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 7041

You say to Dauntless: "This is very typical of shills, just attack someone's credibility, just because I asked a question about expected revenues and earnings." So true! Linda

To: Michael who wrote (3788)	5/2/1998 3:40:00 PM
From: Diamondcutter	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 7041

Well, then what's your definition of a shill? I don't have a dictionary handy, but to me that is a person who has nothing but good things to say about a stock (in this case) regardless of its truth. Thus, if you are accusing people to be shills, you must be saying you're concerned that they are trying to fraudulently move the price up. Secondly, I do not appreciate being called a shill. If you search my past comments (I do not think you will find me in that category (if it exists). You accuse without knowing or seeking any facts. Lastly, I will also stand by my comments that for any generic startup company with a potentially breakthrough product that current earnings (R&D spending) are not meaningful! How could you deny this? If a company is losing...$1 per share today and could be making...$5 in a couple years (don't get excited, I'm not talking about ZONA), would this mean the stock is worthless? I am not attacking your intelligence or credibility, but I can only assume by those questions that you don't know the story being discussed. Diamondcutter