Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Micron Only Forum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: DavidG who wrote (32713)	5/2/1998 1:07:00 AM
From: TREND1	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 53903

David Are we the only ones that realize the "big" difference between SDRAM 66MhZ and SDRAM 100Mhz ??? Are we the only ones that realize the "big' difference between a LX440 and BX440 ? Are we the only ones that realize the difference between a PII 333 and a PII 350 ??? (1) FPM dram (2) EDO dram (3) 66Mhz SDRAM (4) 100Mhz SDRAM I give up ! Larry Dudash

To: DavidG who wrote (32713)	5/2/1998 4:06:00 AM
From: Skeeter Bug	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 53903

david, pat at least has the sense to keep his mouth shit when he is wrong. i commented what i thought to be true. because i'm honest, when pat said my position was was absurd and that my facts were wrong i looked for a source. i couldn't find one and then i asked questions. when i got my answer i now have a source. that is intellectual integrity. your crapola about the numbers are fake and you give no explanation, source nor alternative is stinky. it is childlike. i'll bet you burned your hand on the stove many times. "but mommy, just b/c it is red doesn't mean it is hot. colors lie." get real dave. pat chimed in with bs that he assumed to be true. he was dead wrong and posted based on emotion and not based on fact. i'd appreciate the courage to admit to such, but, few people have it. most people just spout whatever the h*ll they want then when they are called to the carpet they change the subject. or disappear. you know the type, dave. better than most. some lost folks rewrite the truth b/c they are blinded by their own egocentrism. you and pat can disagree with me about the future. but if either of you think you can arbitrarily and wrongly attack facts without getting it thrown right back at ya you are WRONG. you are wrong. your attempt at ad hominem (again, look it up) is obvious - and lame. then again, you are wrong. so here we go again.