Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : International Precious Metals (IPMCF) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Dave V who wrote (31948)	5/2/1998 3:51:00 PM
From: go4it	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 35569

Dave, I would first like to say that I appreciate the vote of confidence. <<Since IPMCF is only approx. 0.30 per share wouldn't it make sense that a big company like Barrick would snap up this company even if they thought there was a minute chance of extracting the gold Just a thought>> Maybe they should but I don't think that is their style. I think that a company like Barrick or PDG or who ever would wait until production was proven regardless of the possibilities. From what I have been seeing lately it appears that there is alot of refractory ores across the entire west coast of North America and these dirts are merely a variation of these refractory ores where brines from the ocean have put a twist on the recovery process. The more I learn about the technical issues revolving around this mineralization the more confident I become. The trouble is that I have always had and still have much difficulty finding out the technical aspects. So I continue my dd on my investments. It sounds like we have the same friends by your description.