Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : JESUS and FINANCIAL FREEDOM -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Emile Vidrine who wrote (895)	5/3/1998 9:05:00 AM
From: Sidney Reilly	Respond to of 1283

Emile, I think that you read too much into what I posted. But I do think Israel is part of the end times events and can be used as a sign of the times. I don't think they are going to be glad for their part because they will suffer badly in the end. Israel will again follow after another god when they follow the anti-christ in the last days and make a covenant with him. <<You are reducing the eternal Body of Christ--the Chritian Church--to a parenthesis between two Jewish dispensations--this is the heresy of dispensationalism. In effect, you are saying that God is removing the eternal Church that He established in His blood and replacing it with the forgery of antichrist Judaism. You have been blinded to the spritual and biblical fact that The Church--the Body of Christ--is the only proper sphere of prophecy under the New Covenant in Jesus's Blood.>> I am not saying what you interpreted here. The Church is still God's chosen people and it is they who will occupy the kingdom Jesus will establish on His return. Israel will play out a role in God's plan one more time. Not one they would willingly choose because it will be their near destruction. Israel provides one of the signs of the times. The Church also plays it's role as the beast tries to force it's mark on all the world, the christians will not take it and the beast will wage war against us and kill many. You have to look closely at this pivotal event in bible prophecy. God has promised He will separate the wheat from the chaff, a difficult job. But there it is, the separation of the wheat from the chaff, the mark of the beast. The Church, Jesus's Body with it's refusal to take the mark of the beast seals the fate of the world just as Noah did when he obeyed God and built the Ark. The mark of the beast is the final prophetic event before the wrath of God is poured out on the unbelieving. <<The heresy of Dispensationalism results from the lack of a proper understanding of the nature of the Old Covenant and its relationship to the New. The dipensationalist have never properly understood the change of Covenants at Calvary. Dispensationalist believe that the "New Covenant has not yet been made. It is to be made with Israel after they get back to their own land. It is promised in Jeremiah 31:31-37." This is one of the most horrible heresies and antichristian teachings of the twentieth century and you seem to have fallen for it.>> I am shy of labels such as dispensationalist. I don't think I am one. I see Jesus from before the foundation of the world until now as constant, never changing. The New Covenant is made with Jesus's blood at Calvary and the new people of God are the born again believers, not those who claim a linage in the flesh. That does not change because God will use Israel one last time to play a role in the plans of God to establish Jesus's Kingdom on earth. The ones who chose to follow the beast and took his mark will not enter the kingdom of Jesus. It won't matter that Jesus establishes His kingdom with Jerusalem as it's center, it's just real estate, it doesn't change any covenant. The new occupants will be the born again followers of Jesus. The ones who took the mark of the beast, Jews and Gentiles, will be history. <<Ask yourself these questions: Has the New Covenant been established?>> YES <<Is the New Covenant in Jesus's Blood temporal or eternal?>> ETERNAL <<Did God intend the Holy Body of Christ as a temporary fix between two more important Jewish dispensations?>> NO. God has used Israel to bring Jesus to the whole world and to establish the New Covenant in Jesus's blood which was His intention from the beginning. That covenant is eternal. <<Has the Kingdom of God been established in Jesus?>> YES <<Will the hundreds of thousands Jewish Apostles, disciples, and believers of the first century foolish in abandoning antichrist Judaism and forming and becoming the Christian Church?>> NO. They saw their God was Jesus and were the ones who believed the promise and recognized the time of their visitation. <<Was Peter wrong when he told Christians that they were 'a peculiar people, a royal priesthood, a Holy nation bringing forth the fruits'?>> NO. We are. <<Was Paul wrong when he said circumcision was of the heart and not the flesh?>> NO. It is. <<Was Paul wrong when he said that the heirs of Abraham were in Christ Jesus? Was Paul wrong when he said "we are the circumcision, we worship God in the spirit and have not confience in the flesh"?>> NO. It's true. <<When you decide to keep your eyes on antichrist modern Judaism to determine what God is doing today, you simply have been coned by the great magician of the ages--Lucifer. He is making you watch the wrong hand while he pulls his deceptive magic and witchcraft. Modern antichrist Israel(Judaism) is a product of Satan meant to deceive the New Covenant Israel--the Christians. It is in fact the little horn that has displaced the three horns(England,U.S, France-Zionism now controls the foreign policy in these nations), and is riding on the ten horn beast(the U.N.) in these last days. The little horn has already begun the persecution of the saints.>> The UN is the arising new world order, satan's government. I don't believe that it is dominated by zionists though. If it were then Israel would not have such a hard time in this world today. The actions against Iraq were not to protect Israel as much as it was to avoid a larger war in the future. Israel has the "Samson Option" which is if they are attacked and going down they will go nuclear as they almost did in '73 when Nixon refused to re-supply them and the USA was actually providing sensitive intelligence about Israel's military actions to they Arabs via a ship in the Med that was feeding the info to the Arabs from satalite observations. Israel knew it and warned the US to stop but Nixon did not. He did not think Israel would attack the ship, which it did and put it out of action. Nixon was very involved in the new world order and was no friend of Israel as the new world order is not. After Israel attacked the US ship they demanded the re-supply they needed to win the war or they would go nuclear. Nixon believed them then and gave in, he learned the hard way. Bush is very involved in the new world order and His Sec. of State did not like Israel at all. He was caught making some very anti-semitic remarks. As far as your interpretation of Daniel I have to look into that more and it will take some time. Months maybe. I hope this helps you to see where I am on these things. Have a blessed day, Bob