Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Greenland Corp. (GLCP) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Chris O'Keefe who wrote (609)	5/3/1998 10:29:00 AM
From: MeDroogies	Respond to of 2278

I agree. Actually, you purchased INVI at the SAME price I did. Feel like a sucker? I got my info here on SI. Seems like the problem there is 2 fold. INVI doesn't have a PR dept., let alone ANY PR. Secondly, the MM's are playing games with the shares in street name. INVI is apparently on a mission to get stockholders to call in certs.

To: Chris O'Keefe who wrote (609)	5/3/1998 11:21:00 AM
From: BarbaraT	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 2278

I hate to admit it ... but I have DMEC (bought on a Top Dog recommendation, that was pulled ) and INVI ... bought that in 1993 or 94 and 12 1/2 and you can forget this one!!! Dan Dorfman came on CNBC and panned this one so badly (I was out of town at the time) that when I came back, the stock had dropped from 14 (I was ahead of the game at that time) to 7. I held on believing it would come back. As it now stands, I have a fortune invested in a worthless stock and am hoping to make significant gains this year in other stocks so I can take this one as a writoff. I bought 3500 shares as well as warrants, now worthless. Now I am lucky if I can afford to buy 3500 shares of a $1 stock -- reversals of fortune, and all that. Never put too much hope in any company. INVI was $12 1/2; and I was novice enough to think that the price itself removed it from the "speculation" category. I had even researched the company but had obviously not done the right kind of research.