Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : DGIV-A-HOLICS...FAMILY CHIT CHAT ONLY!! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Secret_Agent_Man who wrote (2332)	5/3/1998 2:29:00 PM
From: Spytrdr	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 50264

Come on, Commander, you know very well I would never betray the coalition. It's just that we don't want artificial price movements in our stock. I agree, DGIV should have closed on friday at $ 10 at least, based on the new revenues announced. So what's the artificial price? But, I still prefer a nice and steady rise tick by tick day by day, than a BIG jump that may tempt many to sell and take profits or daytrade this stock. ___ message from Byron Glenn on May 3 1998 2:21PM EST It appears that "some" people may have ulterior reasons, motivations for us not calling for our shares. If we are indeed a Coalition, Collective Group, then those whom would seek to break up the coalition may in fact not be part of the Collective?

To: Secret_Agent_Man who wrote (2332)	5/3/1998 2:42:00 PM
From: chip	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 50264

Byron, Why is this questioning trying to break up our "coalition"? It sounds like a valid question to me that has nothing to do with "loyalty". And you and other's have certainly warned us about price fluctuations and mm games. And then you've gone on to say that it still doesn't matter, for the facts of the company are inevitably going to take the stock where it's going to go regardless. So if you're going to take a long-term view, what difference does it make one way or the other? I'm certainly thinking about calling for my shares like you guy's are now DEMANDING; I really dislike paranoia, calling people wolves in sheep's clothing. Come on. Chip >If we are indeed a Coalition, Collective Group, then those whom would seek to break up the coalition may in fact not be part of the Collective?<