Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Solucorp Industries (SLUP - OTCBB) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: hawkeye who wrote (65)	5/3/1998 3:48:00 PM
From: Arcane Lore	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 3679

First, let me give you a link to what I believe is the current* version of rule 15c2-11: law.uc.edu As you undoubtedly know, Solucorp is a reporting company with its latest filing being a 10-K filed on 4/15/98 for the period from 7/1/97 to 12/31/97: sec.gov What I belive will suffice for the requirements of 15c2-11 is for the company to file updated financial information, including information addressing SEC's concerns. In the case of shopping.com, the company did exactly that and as of 4/30/98 it reopened to trading through its principal market maker Waldron and Company (see #reply-4294770 ,#reply-4301175 - in connection with the first post note that the currently correct link is now ocregister.com - since OCR occasionally changes the links you may need to use their search facility) Needless to say the updated filing should be 'squeaky clean'. What happens then is that a NASD market maker needs to file and NASD needs to approve the application. It is possible the company could get by with less than what I described above. FWIW I don't know of any recent examples, but perhaps I've missed some. In any event the process is likely to be time consuming and extend beyond the 2 week halt. * There is a proposed modification to the rule which can be found at: sec.gov