Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Rocky Mountain Int'l (OTC:RMIL former OTC:OVIS) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: MY OPINION who wrote (46651)	5/3/1998 7:54:00 PM
From: Pugs	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 55532

Daddy, You're absolutely correct. Puhrty sent me an EMail telling me that Baker was given an account from Mork in which he was supposed to short "pigs", he said Mork refered to the stocks he was shorting as "pigs". OVIS was one of the "Pigs" Baker was shorting thru Vancouver for Mork. Either Puhrty lied to me in his EMail, or he lied on the thread. Either way he was a liar. One should remember that the diligence Tonto is dependent upon is from these same characters in the Mork camp who are documented liars. IMO, Mork, via a certain broker, fed Tonto tainted information about the meeting, because as you had pointed out before, Morgan's take on the meeting, which jives with one bmart emailed me, is very incriminating to Mork. Whether Morgan agreed with the 'scenario' Mork presented him is secondary, it's a no-win situation for Mork because, either way, Mork presented a "vulgar" scenario to Morgan. Morgan rebuffed Morks' vulgar offer, even if Morgan would have accepted the offer, Mork's hands are just as dirty, he brought the offer to Morgan. Puhrty lied. And in Tonto's haste, it appears he trusted Mork and his broker accomplice, where diligence would have prevented him from 'stepping' in it. Pugs