SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks : Greenland Corp. (GLCP) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Alan Coccio who wrote (680)5/3/1998 3:41:00 PM
From: Due Diligence  Respond to of 2278
 
so?
Jimbo



To: Alan Coccio who wrote (680)5/3/1998 3:59:00 PM
From: Ralph Moser  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 2278
 
WAKE UP.... Guess what, this company has just very good prospectives, also from a fundamental point of view. They do have a very good technology, the FCC approval under way and don't forget about the markets outside the US (without the FCC approval). Do you really think that all the investors buying up this share are just dump and blind. Do you think so? I'm sure you do know they aren't and just look for some cheap shares.
Am I right.................



To: Alan Coccio who wrote (680)5/3/1998 4:56:00 PM
From: Mike Felty  Respond to of 2278
 
Alan
I am not aware of the authorization increasing. What makes you think so?



To: Alan Coccio who wrote (680)5/3/1998 9:28:00 PM
From: Catfish  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 2278
 
NASD Regulation Disciplinary Committee Bars La Jolla Capital From Penny Stock Transactions

And Orders Fines And Restitution Of More Than $950,000

WASHINGTON, D.C.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Sept. 11, 1997--NASD Regulation, Inc., today announced that its Los Angeles District Business Conduct Committee (DBCC) has ordered that San Diego-based La Jolla Capital Corp. be permanently barred from selling penny stocks and that five of its senior officials should be sanctioned for circumventing the penny stock rules. Penny stocks are unlisted securities that trade over-the-counter and are priced under $5 per share.

As a result of a 16-day hearing by the DBCC, La Jolla Capital and its President Harold B.J. Gallison were fined more than $400,000 and are jointly responsible for repaying more than 100 investors from 26 states, the District of Columbia, and British Columbia almost $400,000. The remaining four senior officials were fined a total of more than $150,000.

Initial actions, such as this, by an NASD Regulation District Committee are final after 45 days, unless they are appealed to NASD Regulation's National Business Conduct Committee (NBCC), or called for review. The sanctions are not effective during this period. If the decision in this case is appealed or called for review, the findings may be increased, decreased, modified, or reversed.

The sales practice abuses at La Jolla Capital were uncovered after a lengthy investigation by NASD Regulation's District Offices in Los Angeles, San Francisco, and Denver. The DBCC found that from January 1994 through May 1995, La Jolla Capital and certain senior officials circumvented investor protection laws in approximately 140 transactions involving 15 separate securities. All of the transactions involve penny stocks.

The violations occurred at La Jolla Capital's offices in San Diego, CA; New York, NY; Las Vegas, NV; Bethesda, MD; and Modesto, CA.

The following senior officials were sanctioned:

1. Harold B.J. Gallison, President, and La Jolla Capital were fined a total of $401,380. He was also suspended in all capacities for 30 days; permanently barred from participating in penny stock transactions; permanently barred from acting as a supervisor; and censured.

2. Robert C. Weaver, Executive Vice President and Chief Legal Counsel, was fined $25,000; suspended as a supervisor for 15 business days; ordered to retake the qualifying examination to become a supervisor, and censured.

3. Gregory K. Mehlmann, National Branch Compliance Officer, was fined $10,000; suspended as a supervisor for 10 business days; ordered to retake the qualifying examination to become a supervisor; and censured.

4. Christopher S. Knight, Branch Manager, was fined $120,854; permanently barred from acting as a supervisor; permanently barred from participating in penny stock transactions; and censured.

5. Gerald J.R. Budke, Branch Manager, was fined $5,150; suspended from participating in penny stock transactions for one year; ordered to retake the qualifying examination to become a supervisor; and censured.

Gallison, Weaver, and Budke are still employed by La Jolla Capital.

The 15 securities involved and sold by La Jolla Capital were: Affordable Housing Constructors, Inc.; Ambra Royalty, Inc.; Drucker Industries, Inc.; Environmental Recovery Systems, Inc.; Exten Industries, Inc.; HEARx Limited; InfoServe, Inc.; Interactive Telesis, Inc. (formerly known as INN Investment News Network Limited); Largo Vista Group Ltd.; Longport, Inc.; Modern Records, Inc.; Peppermint Park Productions, Inc.; Photo Acoustic Technology, Inc.; Quadratech, Inc.; and XO Corp. There is no allegation that the affected companies knew of, or were involved in, these violations.

The DBCC found that La Jolla Capital designed a system to circumvent the Securities and Exchange Commission's (SEC) strict penny stock rules which ensure that investors receive honest and candid information about risk disclosure and suitability issues before they invest. La Jolla Capital had investors sign a misleading document that purported to exempt the transactions from the penny stock rule requirements. The letters were portrayed to investors as a ''formality,'' and in some cases investors' signatures were forged. La Jolla also was found to have implemented misleading and deficient supervisory policies and procedures designed to foster the improper claim of this exemption.

Between February 1996 and October 1996, 22 other La Jolla Capital brokers and supervisors, without admitting or denying liability, were fined and disciplined in connection with this case. La Jolla Capital employs 140 brokers in 11 offices in California, New York, Georgia, Utah, Nevada, and Texas.

The DBCCs are comprised of elected representatives from the securities industry who serve three-year terms.

NASD Regulation oversees all U.S. stockbrokers and brokerage firms. NASD Regulation, along with The Nasdaq Stock Market, Inc., are subsidiaries of the National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc. (NASD(R)), the largest securities-industry self- regulatory organization in the United States.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Contact:

NASD Regulation, Washington, D.C.
Media Contact:
Michael W. Robinson
202/728-8304
Robinsom@nasd.com




To: Alan Coccio who wrote (680)5/3/1998 9:46:00 PM
From: Catfish  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 2278
 
This is a case that involved negative postings about a company on AOL. Perhaps, you will remember this one. Darrell

Subj: Public apology to fonix
Date: 96-10-23 23:49:31 EST
From: WillyTRa

My Name is Trent Ridd. I have previously used the handle/pseudonym "WillyTRa" to make postings concerning fonix corporation and Roger Dudley. I am a registered financial consultant with a national brokerage firm.

As a result of my prior posting regarding fonix Corporation and Roger Dudley, CFO of fonix, I was sued by them for slander. Statements I made, causing them to sue me, were wrong. I recognize my mistakes and want to settle the claims that fonix Corporation and Mr. Dudley have asserted against me. The obvious first step toward doing that is to admit I was wring and to make a formal and complete apology to fonix Corporation and Mr. Dudley. Further, I have agreed not to make further postings about fonix Corporation. If I violate that agreement, I will be subject to further penalties.

To fonix Corporation, Roger Dudley and all others I have offended with my past posts, I sincerely apologize. To Mr. Dudley, I owe a special apology. My statements and implications regarding him and fonix were wrong and totally inappropriate. My statements cast him and other officers and directors of fonix in a misleading light -- a result I deeply regret. While I never intended to harm anyone, including fonix Corporation and Mr. Dudley, I was wrong to comment in such a misleading, antagonistic and aggressive manner without having all of the facts, which I did not have. I have never held any position of fonix stock, long or short, and in no way intended to benefit financially by my postings.

My postings may have also violated certain of my firm's policies and I recognize that my actions may cause embarrassment to my firm. For that I also apologize to my firm

I genuinely regret my actions. Please accept my sincere apologies.

WillyTRa/Trent Ridd

SALT LAKE CITY, Oct. 23 /PRNewswire/ -- Stephen M. Studdert, chairman and chief executive officer of fonix(TM) corporation (Nasdaq: FONX), announced today that the company has received the public apology from Series 7 licensed stockbroker, Trent Ridd, who uses the pseudonym "WilleyTRa" for his Internet postings. In his apology, Mr. Ridd admitted that his statements made on the Internet concerning the company were wrong and totally inappropriate, and cast officers and directors of fonix in a misleading light. As part of his apology, Mr. Ridd is purchasing shares of the company's stock in open market
transactions, which stock will be held in a voting trust. The company has settled its claims against Mr. Ridd and has accepted his apology.
"We regret any concern that this incident may have caused fonix
corporation shareholders. Mindful of our own fiduciary responsibility, we again reaffirm our pledge to act in our shareholders' best interest in all matters," Studdert said. "fonix management will not tolerate any attempt to discredit or impugn the integrity of its officers, directors and most importantly the proprietary voice recognition technology it has developed to
benefit shareholder value." The full text of the apology was posted this same date on America Online (AOL). "The freedom to communicate -- and even more the freedom now to communicate to a worldwide audience via on-line services -- brings with it certain responsibilities," said Studdert. "Those who would violate the public
trust, notwithstanding presumed anonymity, must be put on notice that their actions are not without consequence."
fonix(TM) corporation, a public company since 1994, is a development-stage company, produces speech recognition technologies using specific-speech knowledge, proprietary speech modeling, and a linguistic process which includes neural networks (artificial intelligence) to recognize natural language speech. As a technology vendor, fonix will license its proprietary speech recognition technology to be used in computer devices for the Internet,
commercial, professional, and industrial markets.




To: Alan Coccio who wrote (680)5/3/1998 11:27:00 PM
From: james reinhart  Respond to of 2278
 
Al, I'm a bit 'green' on this subject but don't the shareholders AND
the BOD have to agree, in the majority, to increase the # of authorized shares? as per stockholders meeting and/or proxy vote. I could be wrong, but I've found nothing to substantiate your claim of an 100% increase of authorized shrs. Currently GLCP is authorized to sell 50,000,000 shrs. TIA

JR