Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : The New QLogic (ANCR) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Alan Aronoff who wrote (16091)	5/4/1998 1:44:00 AM
From: srvhap	Respond to of 29386

<<If you so strongly disagree with management's vision, why on earth do you want to own shares in the company? You don't like management and you don't like the BOD? Get your money out of this dog now. Vote with dollars not with a postage stamp IMHO.>> Alan, I tend to agree with Mike, it is not as Black and white as you portend. Some where sucked into the hype at higher levels and would have to sell a a rather substantial loss - here in the sixes. There have been many, many missteps by this company, many before the current management, though many of the same problems persist (no FC/GE IF, no follow thru on the one switch deals (read one trick ponies), more G&A than Revs over the past 2 years, etc...., no news!!!! that would make a shareholder feel that there was any reason, that it would be in our best interest (the OWNERS of the company -- the share holders) to further dilute the stock in this company. Come on!! We have seen off shore deals and another private placement done with No! No! Benefit to us, other than maybe giving ANCR a little more time. I am with Mike, It is time for ANCR to show a little for the LONG term shareholder. PS. Kerry please don't attack me I well not respond to you!

To: Alan Aronoff who wrote (16091)	5/4/1998 1:57:00 AM
From: janski	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 29386

I intend to vote as follows: 1. No. The two BOD members to be re elected do not own any shares in in the company. As you say they never voted with their wallets. Neither did most others and I will vote against them next time. 2. Yes. The company needs to offer incentives to attract new talent if they are ever to grow. 3. No. I don't want to see any poison pill at this time. If they can't figure out how to generate revenues/earnings they should sell the company There is no floor to the B or C class shares. If the common were to really tank and those were to convert at that time you would need these millions of extra shares to accomodate that. Another reason for me to see the company sold before that happens. 4. Yes. It's a done deal.