Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Naxos Resources (NAXOF) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: BGM who wrote (12558)	5/4/1998 10:43:00 AM
From: mark silvers	Respond to of 20681

BGM I believe at this point it is still a go. As far as Agenda's, it depends on what side. Our agenda is to get out of blast range from ASC shrapnel. The ASC's agenda is to turn us into a little grease spot in the desert. As far as actual timing agenda's, I am not sure what the procedural agenda is. Mark

To: BGM who wrote (12558)	5/4/1998 11:09:00 AM
From: Tom Frederick	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 20681

BGM, I do know the "event" was on as of Friday. However, I do not know anything of the schedule or agenda. IR was very confident about their position, but the only thing that actually matters is what comes out of it. The selling on Friday might very well have been someone who just couldn't go through another ASC hearing and decided to bail. My opinion is that Naxos will do fine as a company. The gold is there, it is only a matter of how much and how deep and what is the method of recovery. The ASC can no longer make any case regarding the reality of PM's. So now it is only trading activity by JJ that is left from the original charges. And if they go after him, that can happen without affecting the progress at the property or the value of FL. We are not likely to know any results of the hearing until tomorrow at best only because they are 3 hours behind and they will finish the day at 8pm est. I hope the company will put out a release as soon as their is a final ruling. I can't imagine why not. Regards, Tom F.