Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : CXI-Commodore Environmental -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: hcm1943 who wrote (769)	5/4/1998 12:11:00 PM
From: KewlHand	Respond to of 1755

Didn't miss your point hcm, I was being flippant in my desire to avoid a short term margin call! ;) I'm aware of the technology they are proposing, and delighted that they now feel they have it in place and working and are confident enought to announce the fact. When I compared the technologies some time back that was the only visible weak link in their chain. I would say that it's going to be VERY difficult for any of the competing technologies to prove themselves safer,cheaper or more environmentally friendly than this one. Commodore simply MUST get at least a slice of the final action! IMHO

To: hcm1943 who wrote (769)	5/4/1998 12:22:00 PM
From: KewlHand	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1755

While were on the subject, is it just me, or are most of the other companies bidding on this project missing 'the point'? Congress mandated this project to find a 'non-thermal' alternative to the baseline incineration. The reason the mandate came into being was that incineration was seen as less and less publicly acceptable. Most of the bidders in this process, whilst providing some clever means of treating the shell/missile contents are still proposing to 'thermally treat' read INCINERATE the actual metal casings left over. Commodores process is SET end to end. What do you think?