SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Disk Drive Sector Discussion Forum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: shane forbes who wrote (3212)5/4/1998 6:02:00 PM
From: T Bowl  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 9256
 
Quick Highlights from the WDC CC:

- broad based technology licensing and component supply agreement.
This includes heads, HSAs, silicon, firmware, etc.
- desktop biz will gain special access to GMR heads and technologies
simultaneous with IBMs development of these platforms.
- does not pertain to all desktop designs of the future.
- agreement does NOT preclude other head suppliers from competing
on future NON-IBM desktop pgms at WD. They can compete on all of our ESG pgms.
- media side is biz as usual with blend of WD internal supply and our current partners.
- IBM supplied 50% of MR heads in MarQ98. That share could increase
if relationship is successful
- WD to continue development efforts on other platforms such as sub 0 DD.
- IBM will NOT make WD DDs. WD will make them and market them as Caviar only
- not an exclusive agreement, but hard to believe IBM will do it with many people due
to anticipated volume were looking for
- Allows IBM to leverage a significant investment in DD technology
- will allow us to be very competitve - even increase share, certainly more profitable
- Sub 0 PC DD will be developed by WD in 3.5" form factor. MR, but might use GMR
in next gens..Areal density is best way to reduce costs usually
- does not change anticipated ramps of pgms in 98. Will push ahead ramp
of first GMR DD in 1H99. Does not change short term plans
- agreement allows pass-thru of technology to other suppliers except for heads.
- IBM has the cost and capacity necessary to satisfy business model
- will not supply media to IBM!
- will not enter mobile arena
- WD will compensate IBM for access to technology.