SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Crystallex (KRY) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: shortee who wrote (8507)5/4/1998 9:41:00 PM
From: E. Charters  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 10836
 
I don't know Wayne, tell me more about reality. I have been trying to get a handle on it for 25 years in the mining game and it's eluded me.
What is you take on the situation?



To: shortee who wrote (8507)5/4/1998 10:20:00 PM
From: Graystone  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 10836
 
Two Dollar Wayne
or
Jack S*it

I really like to see these type of opinions voiced here on SI. We actually have a chance to look at a poster here who has contributed literally nothing.
His attitude problem is exacerbated by the fact that valid contributors, like charred and E. Charters are actually discussing matters which may be pertinent to all longs and shorts.

Disregarding waynes lack of contribution, a review of the thread shows that E Charters and charred have been discussing Albino, charred is not impressed <g>. They are in fact damaging Asensio with this discussion. I am sure wayne would rather talk about his delusions. As a person who is all in favour of facts, I find this discussion, about mill expansion, slope of pit, actual recovery costs, much more realistic than the previous conversation we were having about Asensio's fraudulent past and his claims here.

I think that you shorts should give your head a shake.

The arguments have been admitted by the Supreme Court. It is why we are awaiting a decision, otherwise, we wouldn't be. You can pretend to legal expertise, even have it, it doesn't change the fact that we are awaiting a decision, does it.

marcos, is this right ? "Siempre que", I don't trust babelfish after learning I have been flying "comitas" (kites)