Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : INFOSEEK (GO) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: purecntry5 who wrote (5677)	5/5/1998 9:32:00 AM
From: ViperChick Secret Agent 006.9	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 9343

If anything, why not sell if you can get a good price(if you already have a profit/which most should) and buy back at a better price?? fuhhhhgettttaboutit........... that rationale doesnt work for many...although it is the one I always ask about the opposite side of the argument is "if I sell it might go higher without me" btw, Faber on CNBC saying some are not excited about XCIT XCIT is a perfect reason why after hour trades mean bumpkus! hit 79 afterhours....too bad it didnt make a huge gap so some of you could short it

To: purecntry5 who wrote (5677)	5/5/1998 9:45:00 AM
From: Tom Klempay	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 9343

If anything, why not sell if you can get a good price(if you already have a profit/which most should) and buy back at a better price?? Reason 1: I don't care to give Uncle Sammy a penny until I have to Reason 2: If you can guarantee me unequivocally that I can get a better price minus the taxes that I'd have to fork over, I might buy into your trading style. Somehow, I don't think that's a guarantee you or anyone else can make. Reason 3: Buy and hold has always worked better for me ('nuff said) SEEK at 31 1/2... Happy SEEKing... -tk