Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : uniView Technologies - UVEW -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Jon Scott who wrote (6850)	5/5/1998 2:09:00 PM
From: _Highlander	Respond to of 6895

Oh, no, no, no .... That will NEVER happen! The split was done to pump the value above $1 for the express benefit of the shareholder and thereby giving us the golden opportunity for our holdings, although ten times less than before, to run up well above $5 ... Why, no right-thinking company would allow a shareholder with 10,000 shares to be raped down to 1000 shares and then deliberately devalued to below $1 where it would again be necessary to do a 10/1 split in order to maintain the NASDAQ(They really care as well) listing and rape your 1000 shares down to 100 for the purpose ...

To: Jon Scott who wrote (6850)	5/7/1998 11:34:00 AM
From: Jon Scott	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 6895

NetChannel has a value of 45 million with 10 thousand subscribers and a much better all-around standing . Where's that leave u-No-view(TM), which probably is 1/10 of NC? 5 million shares at $1.62 is somewhere near $80 million dollars. So we can at least cut that to .80 cents Little staff(what AOL was after), no assets,no capability, no dedication and a shady reputation. After it's all said and done, we are properly valued nearer to where we were pre-split(20-25 cents). Maybe. Yet Custer marches on with that smirk on his face and exploding bank book tucked under his designer lapel. Yet nobody investigated or filed suit Amazing!