SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : BORL: Time to BUY! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Lewis Edinburg who wrote (10456)5/5/1998 11:57:00 AM
From: Mark Bracey  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 10836
 
Something that is starting to bother me is that BORL's Client Server/Enterprise sales accounted for 57% of sales, but the core tools numbers were down.

This indicates (to me at least), that BORL's original customer base is not buying the uprades like they used to. As an owner of Delphi 1,2,3 C++Builder 1 3, and JBuilder 1, I bought these out of loyalty and curiosity. Documentation problems notwithstanding, these products have been nothing but excellent (I'd rather read the VCL source than pour thru doc anyway). I use Delphi 3 and am slowly converting to BCB 3 for my development. Except for the new Project Manager, it is hard for me to imagine what they could add in the future that would really make my life easier (sans multiple inheritance). I believe people are quite satisfied (for the most part), with the existing products and that is why there are fewer upgrades going on. Perhaps BORL should put some planned obsolescence (like MSFT) in to make people feel the need to upgrade.

I bought the upgrades to VC++, not out of loyalty, but out of disgust for the product in hopes that the new versions would be better.



To: Lewis Edinburg who wrote (10456)5/5/1998 9:42:00 PM
From: Kashish King  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 10836
 
Lewis, don't make assumptions and please don't be so naive. If you aren't up to speed on software publishers tactics I suggest you do some homework before dismissing Katt's crystal clear implications. I'm open to alternative explanations, but we've already got an ample supply of drivel thank you. I would hate to see this thread turn into a butt-kissing retreat for corporate sycophants, how about offering something of substance.