Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : JAB International (JABI) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lionel Gosselin who wrote (3600)	5/5/1998 3:04:00 PM
From: ladystaed	Respond to of 4571

one thing that he failed to mention was the official reverse 10/1 split effective 5-12.

To: Lionel Gosselin who wrote (3600)	5/5/1998 3:19:00 PM
From: Eric Freeman	Respond to of 4571

Question Lionel? Are you going after all the people that have hyped up this stock on these threads also?? You know - buckets of gold, stock is going to $20. If you are so concerned about false information, maybe you should pay attention to the other side of the coin. I for one have been negative on this stock for some time. I make no secret of that fact, based both on TA and having traded similar small gold stocks for years. Am I one of your problem children?? If so send me an Email - I make no secret of my name, or Email. These threads are for BOTH sides of the story - so if you do not like the negative stuff, do you devote equal diligence on the possibility of people making false claims that are pro BCMD?? Let us know, since I feel that based on the performance to date and postings over last few months the pro -hype camp far outposts any negative comments. It is a fact, however, that the negative group has been accurate to date in their predictions. Therefore the advice was good so far. Isn't that the purpose of these threads?? To try and come to a rational opinion on a stocks future performance. After all is said and done - it gets down to the price of the stock. I agree with you, that if people conspire to spread false information it should be investigated, but as I reiterate - it should be a two way street. Where were you when people were making claims on the pro side which do not seem to be accurate? So where are we? (IMO) The actual problem right now (IMO) appears to be a lack of real substance at BCMD, and this has led to a deflation of stock price because the expectations might have been way too high. And was that partly due to hype.(the pro camp making claims) If not, what was the basis of their purchases, and run up of stock price?? So (IMO) The problems at BCMD are not caused by those playing the stock - they lie with the company and its performance to date- (IMO) BCMD - just produce results, and the stock will take care of itself. By the way Lionel - who is selling all that stock over the last few months, now that you have raised the question?? Are you saying you do not know?? Eric Freeman

To: Lionel Gosselin who wrote (3600)	5/5/1998 5:17:00 PM
From: mamah	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 4571

Lionel, your statement "Brush Creek encourages the free flow of information about the Company"..... In the spirit of this statement, please have the courtesy to advise the shareholders of this company formally of the answers to the following questions: (1) Why were we, the shareholders of this company, not notified of the pending 1:10 reverse split, if, in fact, we are going to be the "victims" of one on May 12th, so that we could make an "informed" decision about our investment, or (how's this for a novelty) have an opportunity to actually vote on it? (2) For the record, please confirm the number of post-split shares that the "offshore" shareholders have an option to buy at .65? Will they be eligible to buy a total of 5 million post-split common at .65? Or..500,000 post-split common at $.65? Or, would that be, 500,000 post split common at post-split (multiple) equivalent of $.65? Simple straightforward questions, Lionel. How 'bout some answers? mamah

To: Lionel Gosselin who wrote (3600)	5/5/1998 5:21:00 PM
From: mamah	Respond to of 4571

Whoops - sorry one more question Lionel? Where's the gold? mamah

To: Lionel Gosselin who wrote (3600)	5/5/1998 7:10:00 PM
From: IRVINESULLY	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 4571

Lionel You of all people should know that we have been waiting and waiting for months upon months for some numbers.....Despite any negativity, if Jim or you would have been able to produce numbers, there would be no holding down the price as you well know. WE STILL HAVE NO NUMBERS...HELL AS FAR AS WE KNOW...THERE STILL ISN'T LINERS EVEN....But we do have another SPLIT!!! you did a great job of keeping that very hush hush....So in other words, now you guys get to go on the Downey Jr. show and get a whole new group of stockholders to keep you going after the split....Now that ours go down the toilet...AFTER ALL, WE CAN BE REPLACED...PROBABLY QUICKER THAN THE LINERS TOO...Lionel, you have my E-mail and work number. You may feel free to call me any time, you know that. What bothers me, is despite the fact that most of the time I have tried to stay on BCMD's side, I feel like I've been suckered and lied to! Ginny