SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Mark Myword who wrote (3984)5/5/1998 7:46:00 PM
From: Jan Crawley  Respond to of 164684
 
Thanks again for your answer and calculations.

This means that their balance sheets will not look very attractive; but Amzn will have sufficient working capital for the next few years; However, If their current revenue/cost ratios do not improve, they would be under more close scrutiny due to this junk bond/loan obligations?

I guess the lenders consider Amzn likely to be an on-going business five years from now. which is a reasonable risk; but it is definitely much more than a reasonable risk for the current share price of over $90. Amzn may deserve a share price of around $90 (future split(s) considered) five years from now if Amzn's operating profits, before interest expense of course, can well afford the debt service of this junk bond at that time.

Jan

p.s. Have learned a lot from your posts. Thanks.



To: Mark Myword who wrote (3984)5/5/1998 9:44:00 PM
From: Jan Crawley  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 164684
 
Please verify the following example:

On a $20,000 loan for one year at 10%, the interest is $2,000.

"regular" loan, interest paid at maturity = interest/borrowed amt =
$2000//$20,000 = 10%

"discounted" loan, Interest//borrowed amt less interest = $2000/$18,000 = 11.1%.

This discounted junk bond/loan amount: $530M at 10% rate is misleading?? actually, the debt carrys a much higher effective rate.?? ( or the stated 10% is the effective rate?)

Jan