SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : AMD:News, Press Releases and Information Only! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Investor A who wrote (5984)5/5/1998 7:25:00 PM
From: Dave Parr  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 6843
 
Investor A, RE: <<A better comparison of Celeron vs PII is 386SX vs 386DX. With 16-bit data bus, the performance degrade from 386DX to 386SX is terrible just the same way as the change from PII to the cacheless Celeron.>>

Seeing the comparison you made, I believe DragonBoy may be right. Intel may not be hurt by selling both a Yugo and a Lexus. Had selling a low end chip like the 386SX and the 386DX at the same time hurt Intel they would have have never sold the 486SX & DX version at the same time. Using that same thinking, the PII and the Celeron should not pose a problem for Intel.

.....Dave