SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Apple Inc. -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Alomex who wrote (12732)5/5/1998 7:31:00 PM
From: HerbVic  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 213177
 
How many have changed their recommendation on AAPL? Since April 15, one? Since Jan. 15, two, or three?

You raise an interesting point. I'll look into it.

Shorts are seeing what they perceive as a wonderful shorting opportunity. A looser MSFT competitor hitting its 52 week high. Granted that characterization is an oversimplification, but it represents the viewpoint expressed time and again by the market majority.

HerbVic

_____
It is indeed possible that shorts are keeping this stock down, but after so many analysts changing their
recommendation on Apple why would they do that?



To: Alomex who wrote (12732)5/29/1998 1:17:00 PM
From: Alomex  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 213177
 
May 5, 1998:

HerbVic wrote: Neither of us can prove our point, so I'll concede the validity of your argument, if you'll reciprocate.

I wrote: Actually, when the short figures are published next month, we'll see who was right. It is indeed possible that shorts are keeping this stock down, but after so many analysts changing their recommendation on Apple why would they do that?

Eric writes today: By the way, this month's short interest data is out. As of 5/12/98 17.4 million shares as of AAPL was shorted which is an increase of 2.9 million shares.

So that settles it.