Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Montello Resources -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Sudhir Khanna who wrote (2120)	5/6/1998 1:19:00 AM
From: JP	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 4256

Sudir -interesting comments. Question- MEO has been at approx. 10% the price of Ashton since last September. It appears to be simply following along based on its proximity to ACA rather than anything else. Sure MEO was 70 cents a while back but ACA was $7. Now ACA is $3.40-$3.50 and MEO is 34-35. Do you really think that things look that different today. MMU and VIP seem to have missed the Kimberlite as well and their communications seem no better or worst when it comes down to the nitty gritty. If Ashton has a commercial deposit -MEO should ride up better that MMU simply due to proximity. Everyone on these threads are watching the movement of these stocks with such low volumes the movement means nothing. JP

To: Sudhir Khanna who wrote (2120)	7/13/1998 11:50:00 AM
From: JP	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 4256

<<I cannot see ACA wanting Montello's property. They could have tied up the land themselves for very little money. They did not because they were aware of overburden problems. This company is doing a poor job of communicating and exploring. I dropped them from coverage (at $0.50) once I found out they were not aware of their own overburden problems. There have also been other problems. I understand John Kaiser has now finally dropped them as well. Look for a bounce in June/July to move on>> Sudhir - you are very quiet. Is this the bounce? JP

To: Sudhir Khanna who wrote (2120)	7/28/1998 10:45:00 AM
From: JP	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 4256

<<I cannot see ACA wanting Montello's property. They could have tied up the land themselves for very little money. They did not because they were aware of overburden problems. This company is doing a poor job of communicating and exploring. I dropped them from coverage (at $0.50) once I found out they were not aware of their own overburden problems. There have also been other problems. I understand John Kaiser has now finally dropped them as well. Look for a bounce in June/July to move on. Send me an E-mail if you would like copies of previous issues on the Alberta Diamond Play. They will explain why I dropped MEO before the results were announced. There is no obligation to subscribe. Sincerely, Sudhir Khanna, P.Eng. Editor, The RESOURCE INDICATOR goldsheet.simplenet.com; So what is your opinion Sudhir on this latest news release? Should we now move on? JP