SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Y2K (Year 2000) Stocks: An Investment Discussion -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: michael tantleff who wrote (11406)5/6/1998 12:14:00 PM
From: Craig Rogers  Respond to of 13949
 
Could money be cycling somewhere else? The chip makers were upgraded?

Craig



To: michael tantleff who wrote (11406)5/6/1998 12:54:00 PM
From: BM  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 13949
 
Gorilla in the making ...

chart.canada-stockwatch.com

My periodic reminder to those on this thread who like quality management and rock-solid revenues for years to come.

For buy & hold investors.



To: michael tantleff who wrote (11406)5/6/1998 1:29:00 PM
From: 45bday  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 13949
 
Now that the hype has disappeared from these threads for a while, and these stocks are all being beaten down to reality perhaps it is time to seriously take a look at those companies that will stand the best chance of profiting if the y2k problem is any where as big as estimated, and the big companies don't decide to do most of the major fixing themselves. You have NANDA's fab 4 which I believe are IMRS, SYNT, MAST and KEA along with numerous others that are highly touted as having the best tool on the market or the best manpower to handle the volumes of work that are surely due to arrive. I am currently long in ACLY, ISLI, ALYD and my horror story DSYSE which I fear I will take to the grave with me. When I compare the prices of many of these stocks now to where they were 6-8 months ago most are available at big discounts. For those of you who really understand this technology, which I surely don't, perhaps share with us which companies really present some value based on conservative estimates of future business and leave all the talk about moonshots and which stock will get to 50 first aside for now. I would hope the shorts would take this opp. to speak up also. Thanks.



To: michael tantleff who wrote (11406)5/6/1998 9:40:00 PM
From: DD™  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 13949
 
Speaking of bad performing Y2K stocks..

biz.yahoo.com

DD