Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Biotech / Medical : Zonagen (zona) - good buy? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: dino who wrote (3952)	5/6/1998 2:07:00 PM
From: Linda Kaplan	Respond to of 7041

Dino: It seem like you're spoling for a new war, doesn't it? Are you frightened? Must be, if you're going after me with stupid attempts at insult. You know nothing of my track record as an investor-- nothing but the delusions you have created along with a few other desperate people here. Unlike some of you, I don't have to brag to shore up my ego. My investments have been a private matter, primarily. Do you stupidly think that because I mentioned a few losses that YOU know the whole story of my investment life? If so, I see you're another true scientist like so many Zonagen investors. It's interesting that you accuse me of being repetitious when I posted something quite new today. Are you mixing me up with someone else? Are or you just scared because I was right on target? Probably the latter. Have you joined the group in this thread who believe that the bigger the lie the more credibility it will have? Don't start attacking me with your lies! I must have really hit home to have brought out such a wild response: multitudes of personal attacks at me. Thanks for the compliment! I knew my note was very funny and very accurate, but I didn't realize it would frighten you so much. Your note suggests that you, like some of your pals, think that if someone has a stock loss that it's a good idea to rub that in, just cause you imagine they're on the opposite side of the stock than you. I consider that poor form. No one active in the market is immune from having stock losses, so what goes around comes around. Basically, people who think it's proper to try to hurt people who they think are already hurting are not people who are worthy of my respect on any level. People like that are insecure and need to make themselves feel better by thinking others are in some ways worse off than they are. That sort of behavior is part of the bad sportsmanship some people in this thread engage in. It's just ugly and unattractive at the least, sadistic and mean-spirited at worst. Seems like your pal is still looking for a mother to help him out, I see, begging for a den mother in almost all his notes, hoping a mother is watching and caring about him, hoping to find a mother to teach him the manners he never learned from his own. It's too late, though. No mother can help a 50 year old who is vulgar. Linda

To: dino who wrote (3952)	5/6/1998 7:00:00 PM
From: Dauntless	Respond to of 7041

Dino & thread Received a new report from Oppenheimer today - updates earnings potential for female indication - updates target for stock to $50/share - will post more details later. Apparently, the article is culled from a conference call with Goldstein - it can be heard thru next weekend at 1-800-925-0851. I haven't tried the number yet but that's what is listed on the report.

To: dino who wrote (3952)	5/6/1998 7:09:00 PM
From: Linda Kaplan	Respond to of 7041

Dino: Thanks for asking me to post more notes. I'll do my best. Thanks also for noticing that there's no more fighting between ma and Dauntless. That's because I stopped responding to the stupid vapid vulgarities he's been posting. I'm glad you appreciate my restraint. It's an interesting phenomenon that some men think that if a woman disagrees with their ideas the solution is that she should have sex. I don't personally think having sex would "fix" the thinking of any man whose thinking is disagreeable. He'd just be a disagreeable man who had had sex rather than a disagreeable man who had not had sex. But logic doesn't apply in his thread, no more than honesty applies. If you'd like to elevate the level of this thread, try leaving intelligent, thoughtful, reasoned notes. I bet you can do that if you try. Have a good day. Linda