Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : AMD:News, Press Releases and Information Only! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Brian Hutcheson who wrote (6014)	5/6/1998 4:16:00 PM
From: Francis Chow	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 6843

MICROSOFT RELEASES BETA VERSION OF DIRECTX 6.0 Microsoft Corp announced the beta version of its Direct X 6.0 software development kit at the Computer Game Developers Conference in Long Beach, California yesterday, hoping to introduce it in time for the 1998 holiday season. DirectX 6.0 is the latest version of Microsoft's collection of multimedia application programming interfaces designed to make Windows a viable platform for games developers. DirectX 6.0 is said to be more stable, reliable and more consistent across APIs than earlier versions, and supports such things as DVD playback, better audio, multi-monitor support and the Universal Serial Bus. Microsoft has struck up development agreements with various chip manufacturers so that DirectX supports multiple graphics hardware. It consists of two parts: the low-level foundation layer, which includes DirectDraw, DirectSound, DirectInput and the new DirectMusic API; and DirectX media layer for high level media integration services. Microsoft says its own research shows that there are over 50 million PCs installed that now support 3D hardware accelerators. DirectX is to be integrated into Windows 98 and NT 5.0 operating systems. The beta version is free to qualified developers, and the final version is expected to ship in July.

To: Brian Hutcheson who wrote (6014)	5/6/1998 10:17:00 PM
From: Elmer	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 6843

<Thanks Kevin + Bob for finding Celeron benchmarks since I have been busy this morning and can't find the time to look for Elmer's benchmarks . You would think he would be able to do that himself as they are so easy to find.> Still true to form aren't you Brian. Fact is that benchmark proved you wrong once again. As usual you didn't bother to check up on that the benchmark showed. You claimed a Celeron performed worse than a 200mhz Pentium. Kevins post showed it exactly equal to a 233mhz Pentium MMX. You are thanking Kevin for proving you wrong. Real bright Brian ggg There have now been 10 benchmarks posted showing a Celeron performing equal to or better than a Pentium 233MMX. You haven't been able to find 1 single benchmark backing up your claim, and you thank your buddies when they prove you wrong. We're getting into Fuchi territory here Brian. EP