To: SI Brad who wrote (1302 ) 5/7/1998 5:10:00 AM From: Jeffrey S. Mitchell Respond to of 32906
Do you think the desire for View Many Messages is driven by low-bandwidth connections? I do. Having switched from a conventional modem to a cable modem (i.e. from 28.8K to, real-world, 1.5M) I can say that "fluff" posts don't bother me in the least anymore as I can now skip them in the blink of an eye. Prior to that, yes, I wish I had ESP in choosing on which messages to chance clicking. Compuserve veterans like myself recall the days of 3600 baud modems and sky-high connect charges where off-line readers were all the rage. [Such software used to log-in, grab all new messages for your chosen thread, allow you to read them off-line, respond, and then upload your responses on the next connect] Theoretically someone could write such a program for SI, but with connect charges being so cheap and with the risk of missing a pertinent message while reading off-line, I doubt many would use one. However, if SI is looking for a fresh source of revenue from its user-base, there are a few options I would pay extra each year to get: 1. A "download thread" button that tossed everything into a Word or text file 2. A "download author" button for collecting all the posts of a given person (I'd love to have a copy of all my own posts) 3. A "download new" button which would key on SubjectMarks and PeopleMarks There are times when I do want to be selective on what I read on a given thread. In those instances I will peruse the index gambling by the text shown which messages to view. Often I don't know how well I spent my time until I've finished reading most of it. Thus, for everyone who wants to see a more detailed summary of the next xx messages, all I can say is you are fooling yourself if you think technology can compensate for human frailties. - Jeff