SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : MSFT Internet Explorer vs. NSCP Navigator -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Gerald R. Lampton who wrote (18926)5/7/1998 1:50:00 AM
From: Charles Hughes  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 24154
 
Extremely interesting. Either that, or maybe I should have been a lawyer :-) Anyway, thanks. Would you say there might have been cause for action no matter which school (as described) would get to make the decision?

Cheers,
Chaz



To: Gerald R. Lampton who wrote (18926)5/7/1998 2:36:00 PM
From: Keith Hankin  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 24154
 
However, it seems that Bork does not base his view that antitrust should be
limited to enhancing efficiency entirely on a love of neoclassical economics. Instead, he appears to ground
it in his conception of the judicial role in interpreting the intent of the Congress when it passed the
Sherman Act.


This sounds a lot like his interpretation of the Constitution, which is (or at least he claims it is) based upon "original intent".