SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Gold Price Monitor -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: ForYourEyesOnly who wrote (11380)5/7/1998 6:52:00 AM
From: long-gone  Respond to of 116830
 
THC,
IMHO I'll chime in,
I would not know if all mining can truely provide safety if there is a
pending Y2k problem, I suspect the largest or the oldest or newest might well do OK as they have the assets to assure internal systems are in line, remember at least one of these was around prior to
Y1.9k(is that ok for 1900?).
The newest should have a very little history to worry about.
But Wall Street is betting the other way. the few middle rang miners I invest in have moved up by a greater % from bottom than my large or small.
rh





To: ForYourEyesOnly who wrote (11380)5/7/1998 10:38:00 PM
From: Albert V  Respond to of 116830
 
It should be remembered that the price of gold went
up in th 1930s due to the president revaluing gold to
35 dollars/ounce, from , I believe, 25 dollars/ounce.
Naturally this would affect the valuation of the gold companies
in a positive way.

Albert


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News