Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Zulu-tek, Inc. (ZULU) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: PartyTime who wrote (6654)	5/7/1998 9:19:00 AM
From: aleta	Respond to of 18444

LOL!!! It's too comical! When I post something that agrees with you, I'm this intelligent, thinking person. Suddenly, when I don't agree with you, I become this sneaky, underhanded creep. You are too funny at times PT. I didn't have to count your posts to NETZ exactly. SI shows our last 80 posts under each of our profiles I think. I just ran quickly down your list and guesstimated. That's why I put 70+ instead of an exact amount.

To: PartyTime who wrote (6654)	5/7/1998 9:21:00 AM
From: JAC	Respond to of 18444

PartyTime, Don't count at least 7-8 of those posts. as NETZ hype...They were about the RED SOX LOL JAC

To: PartyTime who wrote (6654)	5/7/1998 10:11:00 AM
From: I Am John Galt	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 18444

How many times did I have to respond to your supposed neutral position, when in point of fact it wasn't a neutral position at all (remember your post where you admitted that you had to come clean and finally announce that you were in the negative camp?) Don't you realize that those in consideration of buying might pay close heed to a voice coming from the so-called neutral zone? Well you weren't neutral and I wasn't going to let you influence those folks like that. My posts challenged this hypocricy. Whether you know it or not, Aleta, you created a lot of work for me (i.e., a lost of posting) before you made your position clear. Of course, I wasn't going to let you posit neutrality only to have you negatively slam the stock my money's invested in. You had to be answered! Go back and count the number of those posts. Oh, for cryin out loud people. Cut the crap. Nobody is in a "camp", nobody has to declare what position they're taking on an opinion on a stock. Let them just bash it. Their opinions will speak for themselves. Nobody is in a certain "camp". This isn't daycare, this is a place to discuss stocks. God, it makes it sound like someone has "defected" to the "enemy". I'm a shareholder, but now that I'm looking in from the outside, it has become ridiculous conversation. That's why I don't participate anymore. Pegging aleta as an "enemy" of the stock does nothing for us, PartyTime. It doesn't help our situation here, and it sure as hell isn't going to move the stock price. She's entitled to have whatever opinion at whatever time she wants. If you want loyalties, go to the RMIL thread. (remember your post where you admitted that you had to come clean and finally announce that you were in the negative camp?) Don't you realize that those in consideration of buying might pay close heed to a voice coming from the so-called neutral zone? Well you weren't neutral and I wasn't going to let you influence those folks like that. Wha? I'm sorry, Partytime, but if little ol' aleta had sole influence in those that are purchasing this stock, then I can only bring up two assumptions. 1, those people were squeamish about this stock, and would sell on the first runup anyways. 2, they know nothing about investing. Absolutely nothing. In which case, I don't want them in the stock to begin with. To buy or not buy on one outsider's opinion is ludicrous. Matty Gregg