SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical : EntreMed (ENMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Tim Cruise who wrote (869)5/7/1998 8:41:00 PM
From: SnowShredder  Respond to of 2135
 
Tim,

Currently I only have a paper copy. I was able to scrounge up this though:

CANCER MODELS: Systems for Identifying New Drugs Are Often Faulty
Trisha Gura

------------------------------------------------------------------------

Screening potential anticancer agents to find ones promising enough to
make human clinical trials worthwhile has not been as straightforward as
researchers would like. Not only have very few of the drugs that showed
anticancer activity in animals carrying transplanted human tumors--known
as xenografts--made it into the clinic, but a recent study conducted at
the National Cancer Institute suggests that the tests are also missing
drugs that do work in humans, possibly because animals and humans do not
handle the drugs exactly the same way. And attempts to use human cells
in culture don't seem to be faring any better, partly because cell
culture provides no information about whether a drug will make it to the
tumor site. To create better models of cancer development in humans,
investigators are now drawing on knowledge of human cancer-related gene
mutations to genetically alter mice so that they carry the same kinds of
changes that lead to cancer in humans. The hope is that the mice will
develop tumors that behave the same way the human tumors do.

SCIENCE Volume 278, Number 5340, Issue of 7 November 1997, p. 1041


I hope this helped,

Where'd He Go?