Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Thread Morons -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: ViperChick Secret Agent 006.9 who wrote (320)	5/7/1998 5:21:00 PM
From: Diver	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 12810

Hey Lisa - Help us out a bit. Give us a link to the post. Let us wallow around in the dirt a bit. 1) Pontificating - 7 2) Ranting - 6 3) Bad information - 1 4) Rudeness w/out wit - 7 5) Sucking people in so you can berate them - 3 6) Minor league, grade school curse words w/out any sense of imagination. - 0 (Name calling would have helped) 7) Get a life - 6 Total Score - 30 out of 70

To: ViperChick Secret Agent 006.9 who wrote (320)	5/7/1998 6:48:00 PM
From: Don Pueblo	Respond to of 12810

Hence Buffett's remarks 'dont rty to valuate.' These are a few of my favorite things. An excellent submission, IMHO, and worthy of a point count in the mid to high 40s; superb pontification, good suck value, the requisite spelling and grammar horror, and utterly moronic thinking. This all begs the question that I do not see brought up as yet, What about baiting the morons into offering submissions? I personally prefer the purer morons, those that take the initiative and demonstrate idiocy without being intentionally provoked. Also, perhaps suck value could be rated at least partially on number of responses... P.S. Love you too you little foxy mammal. BAWK! :>