Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Speedfam [SFAM] Lovers Unite ! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Daniel P. Dwyer who wrote (2975)	5/8/1998 12:44:00 AM
From: Donald B. Fuller	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 3736

>>For all we know, Samsung might be pissed off at Parks, and SFAM gets no sales for spite.>> Well, there it is then. Either it will or will not get better with Dr. Parks. To me, his resume appeared strong. Don

To: Daniel P. Dwyer who wrote (2975)	5/8/1998 3:54:00 AM
From: SemiBull	Respond to of 3736

<<For all we know, Samsung might be pissed off at Parks, and SFAM gets no sales for spite.>> I wonder whether SFAM would make such a hire then. True, none of us know for sure, but in my business, you find out from Samsung first if its ok to hire him before you extend an offer....sound savvy customer approach....something that SFAM has shown a propensity for in the past. IMHO, I doubt SFAM would hire him if there was even a remote chance of pissing off any potential customer - including Intel for whom he apparently has worked for. In this industry, pissing customers off is a quick way to an early demise. SFAM's managment is too smart IMHO for that. Just one man's spin....SemiBull