To: _scott who wrote (1583 ) 5/8/1998 9:38:00 PM From: cage Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 2011
Scott, I can't really add much if anything to what has been said either. Sometimes there is just a lull in the great race. As was pointed out be Elliot, IAIC has met its goals from the past, and has set out its goals for the future-some of which allow for the questions on most investors minds in regards to y2k companies in general-what about "after" the year 2000. IAIC is working on that issue at this time but it is not as urgent as the y2k issue, which is in a time crunch situation-that, for some reason, has still not caught the eye or favor of the street in general (after an initial run up and pull back a while ago) , and that is for almost the entire sector, not just IAIC. The one major thing that sets the y2k problem apart from most others is-not only does it have to be fixed, it has to be done in a relatively small time frame. Why the street has failed to get hot on it again is a bit of a mystery but it is a matter of time (and not a lot of it) and the street will once again be riding the good companies in that sector sky high. A lot was made of CA World and I think many of us got caught up in hopes of immediate jumps, when in reality it takes a little time for companies that get introduced, to chat and come to terms on deals that will effect their future. As was also pointed out, there will be more than just a few things coming out of CA World. They just are taking a little longer to get out to the press than we would want. IAIC is still hiring people-doesn't sound like they are ready to pull up stakes-expanding for increasing work load-the vector vest tool may work with certain types of stocks but trying to use it to correctly interpret the future prospects of all types of stocks is inappropriate, and I too am curious as to what the 0-2.00 readings #'s are on stocks such as KTEL, etc. today and what they were a few weeks ago.