Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Micron Only Forum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: ratan lal who wrote (33038)	5/8/1998 12:43:00 PM
From: DavidG	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 53903

Ratan, Well since you are asking. I think the whole thing is silly and the only way, I mean ONLY, is if TXN practically pays MU to take the DRAM business off of TXN's hands. Let's face it the DRAM portion of TXN's business is less than worthless since they could not compete with SEA let alone MU. Now if they were going to give it away then give it to a USA co maybe with some strings attached. MU does not pay anything but yet runs the company and splits the agreed profits<g> if there are any. There may be a dollar value attached but it would probably be in the form of a TXN loan to MU with little or no interest. This has occurred in the past with other companies. Remember NOVL gave Corel Word perfect for a fraction of what was paid and just took Corel stock in exchange and I believe gave them a loan. DavidG