Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : Any info about Iomega (IOM)? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: s. bateh who wrote (54306)	5/8/1998 12:40:00 PM
From: Kevin	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 58324

Even at 79 they are cashing in on profit, ehh? Good, Good! BTW, it's won't, not woun't.

To: s. bateh who wrote (54306)	5/8/1998 12:42:00 PM
From: jwk	Respond to of 58324

short term rev's is just one leg of this pony -- remember, every drive that IOM gets out there is one more vote for the compatibility standard. The inhabitant of Planet Lumpy continues to orbit around the much discussed sdrawkcab compatibility issue. I think the best response to that red herring was offered by Zead or someone a few months back when they announced their plans to produce and market a VAR fix for Lumpy. It is known as the DUCT DRIVE, and to my knowledge, resolved the issue once and for all. jak!

To: s. bateh who wrote (54306)	5/8/1998 1:35:00 PM
From: Michael M	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 58324

s. bateh, thanks for all the updates.....they seem to irritate Jock. I think that's a good thing. Astonishes me that a person with no position in the stock gets so worked up about it.

To: s. bateh who wrote (54306)	5/8/1998 2:08:00 PM
From: Jock Hutchinson	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 58324

next time you go buy something from a store ask the clerk what his cost is and how much he is makeing off of you...i woun't give you that info Mr. Bateh: I sincerely respect your right to keep your business information private. However, "your trust me" approach just doesen't hack it. Indeed it's dishonest, because you are trying to portray IOM as selling its products like hotcakes, when you are in a position to provide information to members of this board that would be counterproductive to an IOM bull. You are among the many who accuse Rocky of being less than forthcoming in divulging his motives, but is it not possible that you are providing an extremely rosy picture of IOM sales so that you can dispose of your stock in IOM?