Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Graham and Doddsville -- Value Investing In The New Era -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: porcupine --''''> who wrote (304)	5/10/1998 10:25:00 AM
From: porcupine --''''>	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1722

GM, Ford not threatened by Daimler-Chrysler merger By David Lawder DETROIT, May 8 (Reuters) - As executives at General Motors Corp. (GM-news) and Ford Motor Co. (F - news) got used to the pronunciation of ''DaimlerChrysler'' on Friday, they said the auto mega-merger doesn't immediately threaten them. Although the marriage of Chrysler Corp. (C - news) and Daimler-Benz AG (DAIG.F) strengthens each company's volume, product lines, geographic reach and investment resources, No. 1 GM and No. 2 Ford remain far larger and richer companies. DaimlerChrysler, forged in a merger valued at about $41 billion based on Friday's stock trading, will remain the world's fifth largest vehicle maker, behind GM, Ford, Toyota Motor Corp. (7203.T) and Volkswagen AG (VOWG.F). Ford spokesman Mel Stephens said the automaker sees no reason to seek out any new automotive partners to combat the DaimlerChrysler threat. ''It shows that this is a global business and volume is important, but we like our position,'' Stephens said. ''When it's all said and done, we wouldn't trade places with anybody.'' Ford already has a major presence in Europe, with extensive operations in Germany and Britain, including the expanding Jaguar luxury car brand. It recently opened a plant in Thailand and is investing heavily in India and Brazil. In Leipzig, Germany, on Friday, GM International Operations chief Louis Hughes said the Daimler-Chrysler merger looked like a good deal for shareholders, but he played down the threat posed by the new company. ''We have been the biggest player on the market for a long time,'' Hughes told Reuters at an American Chamber of Commerce meeting. ''This means there is now one very large competitor in the industry, albeit not across the broad spectrum of products.'' Hughes also said it was ''too early to predict whether there will now be a wave of consolidation in the industry or not.'' Analysts also said GM and Ford do not need to immediately change their strategy to compete with DaimlerChrysler. ''We think they are not too badly threatened,'' said Nick Colas, the U.S. auto analyst for CS First Boston. ''This does not materially change their prospects.'' Ford had a staggering $21.3 billion in cash in its automotive operations at the end of the first quarter and GM had $13.6 billion. Chrysler had $7.85 billion, but its war chest for automotive uses will not match that of Ford and GM after the Daimler deal, Colas said. Ford and GM also can still spread their costs over larger vehicle volumes and have more overlapping vehicle platforms than DaimlerChrysler will -- offering them more opportunities to consolidate operations and cut costs. Chrysler Chairman Robert Eaton and Daimler Chief Executive Juergen Schrempp went to great lengths at Thursday's news conference to emphasize that the union will not lead to job cuts or facility closings. They predicted cost savings of $1.4 billion in 1999, largely from purchasing and research savings. GM plans to slash $4 billion from costs this year, and Ford is widely expected to beat its $1 billion cost-cutting target this year after reducing costs by $3 billion. One area where the new DaimlerChrysler could challenge Ford and Chrysler, analysts said, is Asia, where all of them are just starting out. Colas, whose firm advised Chrysler in the transaction, said the deal will allow the combined firm to invest more in new Asian operations than either company could have invested alone. Each company at best had $1 billion to $2 billion annually to spend on Asian plants. ''They were effectively betting the ranch every time they did so,'' Colas said. ''The combined company does have the critical mass to make very chunky, very aggressive investments in emerging markets.'' Vice President Al Gore, who gave a speech in Detroit on Friday, declined to say whether he thought the proposed merger would pass muster with federal antitrust officials. But he praised the efforts of the American auto industry over the past several years, saying it ''has never ever been stronger.'' Gore said he was an early supporter of the government's 1980 bailout of Chrysler, which saved the company from bankruptcy. ''Just imagine how things would be different if that had not been done back then,'' he added. Gore began his speech to Detroit business leaders by joking, ''Is there anything big in the news?''